Our methodology, in public
In August 2026 we visited the website of every agency in this comparison and recorded only what each site itself publishes. Nothing here comes from reviews, rumors, screenshots or third parties. Where a fact does not appear on an agency's own website, the table says "not published" — which is itself a data point. The seven US-market agencies on this page are part of a wider verification we ran across 40 agencies in total: 33 in Europe and 7 in the United States.
We scored each agency on five criteria. All five are deliberately binary and verifiable — you can re-check every one of them yourself in about five minutes per agency:
- Is the commission published? An actual figure on the website — not "revenue share," "commission-based" or "each contract is unique," but a number.
- Verifiable legal details? A registered entity name, a company number you can look up in a public registry, or at minimum a physical address.
- Clear terms before the call? Can a creator read the actual terms — commitment length, exit conditions, account ownership — before getting on a sales call?
- Detailed service scope? Does the site say specifically what is included: chat, traffic, content, pricing, reporting, protection — or does it stay at "we scale your account"?
- Verifiable size signals? Creator counts, team size, years operating — and whether those numbers are backed by anything, or self-reported by the agency about itself.
What we did not score: "quality," "results" or "vibes." Those cannot be verified from the outside, so they are not in the table. And one observation worth stating plainly: three of the seven agencies compared describe themselves on their own websites as the best, the world's leading, or the #1 agency. At most one of those claims can be true, and none of them comes with published evidence. That is exactly why this page compares publishable facts instead of adjectives.
One more source we reviewed: Supercreator's agency directory (supercreator.app/agencies), which describes itself as "The Only OnlyFans Agency Directory for Creators." Any agency can submit a listing; the Supercreator team verifies before adding, and the directory itself states it does not endorse any agency. It is a useful cross-reference for discovering agencies — it is not a ranking, and inclusion is not a recommendation.
The comparison table
Eight agencies, four verifiable facts each. Everything below was taken from each agency's own website in August 2026. Quoted phrases are the agency's own words.
| Rank |
Score |
Agency |
Commission published |
Legal entity |
Size claims (as published) |
Terms before the call |
| 1 |
5/5 |
Empire Management |
30/25/20% on net — published |
Incorporated company |
18 countries |
Published on this site |
| 2 |
2/5 |
Bunny Agency |
Not published — "no upfront costs" |
LLC name only |
"400+ creators," "112+ team members," "since 2019" (self-reported) |
No |
| 3 |
2/5 |
TDM Management |
Not published — "revenue-share basis," no figure |
UK company no. 13816810 |
Team based in the UK; no figures |
No |
| 4 |
1/5 |
AROA Agency |
Not published — "revenue split," no figure |
Miami address, no entity |
"30+ Elite Creators," "10+ Years," "150+ Global Team" (self-reported) |
No |
| 5 |
1/5 |
Creators Inc |
Not published — structure explained before deciding |
Not published |
"$2 billion in creator sales" (self-reported, ecosystem-wide) |
No |
| 6 |
1/5 |
Model Starz |
Not published — "Each contract is unique" |
Not published |
"7-Figure Agency," team across U.S./Europe/Asia (self-reported); no creator count |
No |
| 7 |
1/5 |
Red Fox Agency |
Not published |
Not published |
Not published |
No |
| 8 |
1/5 |
Teasy Agency |
Not published — "commission-based model," no figure |
Not published |
"Co-founded by a female creator" (self-reported); no creator count or years |
No |
Score = criteria met under this comparison's public methodology, verified on each agency's own website (August 2026). Empire Management, the publisher of this page, ranks first for meeting all 5 criteria — we do not claim to be "the best agency" in absolute terms; we state what can be verified. How each criterion is counted, using only what is already written on this page: (1) a commission figure published; (2) verifiable legal details — a registered entity or company number; an address alone does not count; (3) terms readable before the call; (4) detailed service scope; (5) verifiable size signals — figures an agency reports about itself without verification do not count. The table runs from highest to lowest score; ties are listed alphabetically.
Source: each agency's own website, visited August 2026. "Not published" means the fact does not appear anywhere on the agency's site — it does not mean the fact is false. Self-reported figures are the agency's own statements about itself, which we could not independently verify. Empire Management's row is our own data, held to the same criteria.
The agencies, one by one
Neutral profiles: what each agency offers, what it publishes, and what it does not. Their claims are quoted as their claims — not as verified facts, and not as accusations. Any of these agencies may do excellent work; this page only records what their websites make checkable.
Teasy Agency
teasyagency.com
Positions itself as "The Best OnlyFans Agency for the Top 1%." Offers management including OFTV, social media marketing, account audits and growth, across three plans (Page Management / Growth & Management / Custom). Describes a commission-based model but publishes no figure. Publishes no legal entity or registration; lists offices in Los Angeles, CA and Las Vegas, NV, with terms naming California jurisdiction. The agency reports that "many creators have doubled or even tripled their earnings."
TDM Management
tdmmanagement.com
Positions itself as "The World's Leading OnlyFans Management Agency." Services listed: finance and accounting, DMCA/legal support, content, marketing and chatting. Works on what it describes as a revenue-share basis; no figure published. Publishes the most complete legal details in this comparison: TOPDRAWERMANAGEMENT LTD, company number 13816810, Lichfield, Staffordshire — a United Kingdom company, not a US one. The agency reports individual results such as "50x revenue" and "+60% first quarter."
Red Fox Agency
redfoxagency.com
Describes itself as a results-driven agency. Services listed: social media marketing, account management, a dedicated "Mature Creators" line, and filming, editing and posting. Publishes no commission figure, no legal entity, no address, and no size numbers. "Sign A Contract" appears as step 3 of its onboarding process; the terms are not accessible before that point.
Model Starz Management
modelstarzmgmt.com
Works with OnlyFans and Fansly creators, including trans models. Services listed: management, promotion, social media, Reddit, production, chat and analytics. On pricing it states "Each contract is unique" and publishes no figure; it advertises "Month-to-Month Contracts" and "zero startup fees" without showing the terms themselves. Publishes no legal entity or address. Describes itself as a "7-Figure Agency" with a globally based team across the U.S., Europe and Asia; no creator count published.
Creators Inc
creatorsinc.com
Full-service agency. Services listed: OnlyFans strategy, planning and operation, chat, PPV and pricing, weekly analytics, and marketing. Its fee or revenue-share structure is explained before deciding rather than published. Publishes no legal entity; it does name its founder (Andrew Bachman) and describes a Los Angeles content house with a presence in Miami. Cites "$2 billion in creator sales" — a figure the agency attributes to its wider ecosystem, not to the agency itself — and shows a press wall including Variety, TMZ and People.
AROA Agency
aroaagency.com
Positions itself as "The #1 OnlyFans Management Agency." Services: management, 24/7 chat, traffic, and legal and accounting support. Describes a revenue split without publishing a figure. Publishes a physical address — 8101 Biscayne Blvd, Miami, FL — but no legal entity or registration. The agency reports "10+ Years," "30+ Elite Creators" and a "150+ Global Team," and advertises "Exit-Anytime Contracts" without providing the document. Website available in six languages.
Bunny Agency
bunny-agency.com
Operates a network of city-specific landing pages (Los Angeles, New York, London, Dubai and others) in nine-plus languages. Services listed: 24/7 chat, Instagram/TikTok marketing, strategy, pricing, branding, analytics and PPV. States "no upfront costs" but publishes no commission figure. Legal details: the name "Bunny Agency LLC" in the footer, with no address or registration. The agency reports "400+ creators," "112+ team members" and operating "since 2019," alongside results such as "$0 to $330K in 3.5 months."
Empire Management
empiremanagementmx.com — this site
Held to the same five criteria. Commission: published — 30% under $1,000 a month, 25% between $1,000 and $3,000, 20% above $3,000, always on net earnings after the platform's cut. Terms published on this site before any call: nothing paid upfront, a three-month initial commitment, weekly reporting, and accounts remaining the creator's property. A legally incorporated company, operating across 18 countries. What we do not publish: income guarantees — because nobody can honestly guarantee one.
The one number that matters
1 of 40
agencies verified in August 2026 (33 in Europe + 7 in the US)
publishes its commission rate
Across the 40 agencies we verified — 33 in Europe and 7 in the United States — exactly one publishes its commission rate on its own website: an Italian agency publishing 35%. For the US market specifically, the count is starker: zero of seven publish a figure. Zero of seven show their terms before a call. One of seven publishes a complete legal entity — and it is a UK company. One of seven publishes a US street address.
Here is what that means if you are a creator comparing agencies. The real market range for full management runs from 30% to 50% of your earnings, and in a market where nobody posts a price, you only hear the number once you are already on the call — after the pitch, after the compliments, after you are emotionally invested in the conversation. A number that only appears on a call is a number that can be shaped by the call: by how much the agency estimates you will accept, not by a posted price you could have compared against three competitors.
This is not an accusation of bad faith against any individual agency — case-by-case pricing has legitimate uses. But the aggregate effect is real: you cannot comparison-shop a hidden number. Which leads directly to the checklist below: if the market will not publish, make the market put it in writing for you.
For the full breakdown of what commissions actually cover at each level — and the gross-versus-net detail that moves more money than the percentage itself — see our companion article: How much do OnlyFans agencies charge? Real commission data (2026).
What to demand before signing — with any agency
Including us. These five things, in writing, before your signature goes on anything. An agency that does real work has no reason to resist any of them:
1. The rate and its base, in the same sentenceThe exact percentage, and whether it applies to gross platform earnings or to your net payout after the platform's cut. The base changes the real cost more than the rate does.
2. Everything included at that rate, itemizedChat, traffic, content, pricing strategy, reporting, protection — listed next to the percentage, so no service can quietly migrate to a separate invoice later.
3. A legal entity you can look upA registered company name and number you can check in a public registry — not just a brand, a logo and a contact form. You are signing a contract; know who is on the other side of it.
4. Term length and exit clause, in the same documentHow long you are committing for and exactly how you leave. "Exit anytime" said on a call is not an exit clause; a paragraph in the contract is.
5. Ownership of your accounts, confirmed in writingYour page, your content, your audience and your access remain yours — before, during and after the deal. If that sentence is not in the contract, do not sign the contract.
For the clause-by-clause version of this list — including the fee patterns that hide inside agency contracts — read OnlyFans agency contract red flags: what to check before you sign, and if you are still deciding whether an agency makes sense for you at all, start with how to choose an OnlyFans agency.
Frequently asked questions
How much do the best OnlyFans agencies charge? +
The real market range for full account management runs from 30% to 50% of a creator's earnings — and in almost every case the number is only revealed on a sales call, never on the website. In our August 2026 verification of 40 agencies across the US and Europe, exactly one published its commission. Empire's is public: 30% under $1,000 a month, 25% between $1,000 and $3,000, and 20% above $3,000, always on net earnings after the platform's cut.
Which OnlyFans agencies publish their commission rates? +
Of the 40 agencies we verified in August 2026 (33 in Europe, 7 in the US), exactly one published a figure — an Italian agency publishing 35%. None of the seven US-market agencies in this comparison publishes a number; all describe a revenue-share or commission-based model without one. Empire Management publishes its rate on this site: 30/25/20% on net, depending on monthly earnings.
Do OnlyFans agencies show their contract or terms before a call? +
Among the seven US-market agencies we reviewed, none makes its terms accessible before a sales call. Some advertise contract features — "month-to-month," "exit anytime" — without showing the actual document. Empire publishes its terms on this site before any call: commission tiers, nothing upfront, a three-month initial commitment, weekly reporting, and accounts remaining the creator's property.
Are agency claims like "400+ creators" or "#1 agency" verified? +
No. Creator counts, team sizes, years in operation and revenue results are self-reported by each agency on its own website, with no independent verification we could find. Several agencies in this comparison call themselves the best or leading agency in the world; at most one such claim can be true, and none comes with published evidence. Treat all of them as claims: ask for verification in writing, and ask to speak with a creator who currently works with the agency.
Is this comparison independent? +
No — and we say so at the top of the page. It is published by Empire Management, one of the agencies compared. That is exactly why the methodology is public, every data point can be verified on each agency's own website, and "not published" is marked wherever a fact does not exist. The comparison uses only verifiable yes/no criteria, not opinions or quality scores. The rank column orders agencies by how many of the five criteria each one meets, with the criteria visible in the table: under this methodology Empire Management holds rank 1 for meeting all five — a verifiable statement, not a claim to be the best agency in absolute terms. Verified: August 2026.